Sun 25 Jun 2006
Councillors back away from earlier stance after complaints
By Brooke Larsen - The Now Coquitlam Staff Reporter
Growls from residents have Coquitlam council stepping back from bylaw changes designed to protect bears. Council voted unanimously Monday to defer changes to its garbage bylaw, a week after giving the same changes preliminary approval at a committee meeting.
According to a staff report, the bylaw would forbid residents from putting garbage out before 5 a.m. on collection day.
Several councillors spoke Monday of angry calls and e-mails from residents, and some assured the public that the bylaw would be enforced only in bear-prone neighbourhoods.
“I want to assure every resident that the intent is that we show some common sense. This isn’t meant to apply in areas where we don’t have a bear problem,” Coun. Richard Stewart said. “We’re trying to keep the picnic basket away from Yogi and it’s for our own sake, as well as for the bears’ sake.”
“I have had many phone calls on this _ I certainly had some of the most I’ve [ever] had on this issue,” Coun. Fin Donnelly said.
“I think this can be tweaked. I think there’s some areas that we can improve on,” he said, adding that he would like to see a provincial representative involved in future discussions of the bylaw amendment.
Coun. Lou Sekora said there isn’t public support for the change and took issue with the proposed $500 minimum fine for violations.
“When I get 50 e-mails a day on this one item, it tells me only one thing - that we are not listening to the general public in this community.
“A $500 fine? Why not make it a six-month jail term?” Sekora asked.
But Coun. Mae Reid said some residents won’t follow the bylaw unless there’s a hefty fine.
“Here we are again at the council, wrestling with all these silly rules and silly fines that we have to do, and it’s mostly for the small percentage of people that really don’t give a darn,” Reid said. “I was in favour of the $500 [fine], and I still am.”
Mayor Maxine Wilson said more research is needed on when garbage should be set out, since some residents have complained that their garbage is being picked up before 7 a.m.
“To do nothing, and to leave things as they currently are is not really an option because we are invading, and we’ll be doing it more when we develop the northeast,” Wilson said.
“If we do nothing, and leave things the way they are now, we’re leading to a likely situation where there could be property damage or _ even worse, human injury or death.”
If approved, the bylaw change would allow city inspectors to ask residents in bear-prone neighbourhoods to use special bear-proof garbage cans if problems arise.
It would also ban the use of bird feeders - another bear attractant - between May 1 and Nov. 1 of each year.
Earlier in the meeting, Ken Wright, the city’s general manager of engineering and public works, said the proposed bylaw change would only be enforced in areas that have bear problems.
“The bylaw encompasses all of Coquitlam, however, we will only be concentrating on the areas where we have proven bear sightings,” he said. “Certainly, we will not be issuing tickets or even speaking to people in Maillardville, for example, when there haven’t been any bear sightings in Maillardville.”
Wright also said residents in problem areas who violate the proposed bylaw will receive at least two notices before they are fined.
“It’s very much a dialogue and, hopefully, we can work together to resolve this issue without having to fine people,” Wright said.
During the past year, there have been 400 calls to the Coquitlam Bear Aware line; roughly 80 per cent from the Westwood Plateau.
“There have been significant increases in bear sightings. In 2002 there were 98 and in 2005 [there were] 1,060,” Wright said.
Last year, the city hired two Bear Aware co-ordinators to educate residents about ways to reduce conflict with bears.
published on 06/21/2006

June 25th, 2006 at 8:37 pm
The Now News June Wed 21,06
Residents react to proposed garbage bylaw
Re: “Garbage fines coming?” Wednesday, June 14.
Our family has co-existed peacefully with bears on Burke Mountain for over three decades, including one period when a bear chose to live under our sundeck for some days.
I’ve never called a conservation officer because there was a bear in the neighborhood; one just needs common sense and awareness to co-exist.
I do understand that the proposed bylaw on garbage fines is well meant, but such bylaws pose a much larger concern for me. I strongly believe that over the past few years, Coquitlam has become vastly over-regulated.
This should be of concern to residents, if for no other reason than the enormous cost of enforcing all of these regulations. Yet there is even a more worrisome aspect to this trend: It is obvious that Coquitlam council and staff have lost their faith in the city’s residents to be governed by education and co-operation.
Instead we have roving bylaw enforcement officers, essentially removed from due process controls, and ever-increasing strictures on our behaviours.
It is my firm belief that one of the most tragic aspects of Sept. 11 in the U.S. has been the erosion of long-cherished personal freedoms, in an understandable rush to protect a shocked citizenry from terrorism.
Here in Coquitlam, I see a parallel: Each bylaw seems to be for a “good purpose” but the net effect is that we are living in an increasingly totalitarian community, and I am beginning to fear the council and city staff as much as they so obviously distrust the populace.
Maggie Fankboner
Coquitlam
Dear Editor,
A $500 to $10,000 fine for putting one’s garbage out too early? What on earth is going through Coquitlam councillors’ heads? Have they lost their marbles?
To my knowledge, the (black) bears are not exactly on the endangered species list, not yet anyhow. While nobody likes to see them shot for no reason, it will have to be done with those which become a nuisance.
As for fines, I have another idea. How about fining the officials and bureaucrats who have and continue to issue building permits into areas which encroach deeper and deeper into the bears’ territory? Burke Mountain and Westwood Plateau come to mind.
It is a sad sign of the times when putting out garbage too early would carry a heavier penalty than street racing or drunk driving, both of which have proven far more frequent and lethal than bear attacks. Please, councillors, think about it.
John Theiler
Port Coquitlam
Dear Editor,
I have written to city hall to voice my complaint over the proposed amendments to the waste management bylaw. It’s obvious we have a bear problem up here on the Westwood Plateau, where I live. It’s high time they imposed a bylaw that allows the city to fine irresponsible residents who leave garbage out overnight for the bears, raccoons, etc. to rummage through.
It’s the main reason we are seeing more and more bears killed in our area. Bravo to the city for taking action. However, they are also proposing the addition of a bylaw amendment that would impose an outright ban on bird feeders for seven months of the year. Myself and other bird lovers in the neighbourhood have gone to some lengths to ensure our feeders are impossible for the bears to access. I ask city council to rethink their wording of this proposed bylaw and only fine those residents who place bird feeders in a bear-accessible area.
It’s not possible to responsibly leave garbage out overnight, but there are methods to responsibly feed wild birds. Let’s not punish those that are ensuring their feeders are bear proof. Bird feeding is a great source of pleasure for many Coquitlam residents and there are methods to still feed them and not attract bears.
Charlotte Gulayets
Coquitlam
Dear Editor,
Congratulations to Coquitlam council for giving preliminary approval to a bylaw last week that will help control bear attractants.
Bylaws are a vital and proactive step in any responsible bear-smart plan. This year, Whistler hopes to be the first community to achieve Official B.C. Bear Smart status; perhaps Coquitlam will be the next?
Looking back at our North Shore bear experience over the past six years and our mass cull of 70 bears (70 per cent of the population) last year, I caution Tri-Cities residents to prepare for a possible mass cull (or kill) of your resident bear population this year.
Regardless of what the public wishes or tolerates, the wildlife authorities have responsibility for reducing risk to people and property and then managing bears. Bears that have eaten garbage and/or been raised on garbage eventually pose a real threat to humans and options are limited.
This reactive cycle of killing habituated bears in B.C. results in approximately 1,000 bears a year losing their lives for what they might do. How do we stop this costly and destructive cycle and truly protect ourselves and the new, wild bears that appear?
Answer: Bear-proof our communities that border wilderness areas as well as we can over the next five to 10 years. So, Tri-Cities residents, please don’t lose heart when you hear the sad news of a bear death or get too frustrated when a bear does damage, but ask yourself and your local council what else needs to be done to be more bear smart.
Barbara Murray
Bear Matters B.C.
North Vancouver
published on 06/21/2006
June 25th, 2006 at 8:47 pm
Another Response to Editor in Tri-Cities Newspaper June 23,2006
Screw-on lids put stop to bears
Jun 23 2006
The Editor,
My husband and I are very upset with the way the city of Coquitlam is proposing to handle the fines for putting garbage out the night before pickup. Just read the recent local headlines. One story reported by the Associated Press noted how a Coquitlam woman arrived home to find a bear eating oatmeal in her kitchen. Another story noted now a bear roaming the streets of Coquitlam tore open a truck canopy in search of garbage inside.
We live in River Springs and we have many bear sightings and alerts each year.
Our household puts our garbage in containers with screw-on lids which seem to deter them. We may wake up to find the containers knocked over but the lids are still on.
All households should be requested to place their garbage in such containers (available at local stores for a moderate price) instead of plastic bags or garbage cans with snap-on lids.
So, where will this end? Will we now be fined for having food in our house or in our car? What about the people who take transit to work and carry a lunch?
Proposing by-laws governing when garbage can be placed curbside and the suggested related fines are just going too far by our council members.
(Editor’s note: Council has deferred bylaw changes for more information.)
Cathy Hughes
Coquitlam
Doubleday Canada Limited
© Copyright 2006 The Tri-City News